Friday, January 30, 2015

The SJW Dogs Broke Their Chain

Jonathan Chait Denounces Political Correctness (Except His)
But, as I’ve been pointing out for a long time, the Obama Coalition is mostly held together by its hatred for cisgendered straight white males like, oh, to pick another random example, Jonathan Chait.
Ever since the 2014 election, the progressive crack-up has been proceeding. Winning covers up a lot of fractures, but losing pulls the masking tape off.
So, in New York magazine this week, Jonathan Chait is firing back at all the Social Media Justice Warriors who denounce him and his friends, such as Hanna Rosin (basically, the Stephen Glass Support Network at The New Republic in the 1990s), for occasionally expressing a thought besides “CSWMs Are Evil:”
How Social Justice Warriors Are Creating An Entire Generation Of Fascists
Finally, what SJWs do not realize is that they are single-handedly cultivating a generation of fascists. The more extreme the left becomes, the more right-wing and reactionary people will become as a result. It happened in the 1980s as a response to the left being overwhelmed with hippies and it will happen again in the future as a response to the left being overwhelmed with SJWs – only, this time, the right-wing will be far more extreme than the likes of Ronald Reagan. SJWs are paving the way for a future dominated by far-right extremists. These so-called advocates of “social justice” are the best gift that neo-Nazis could have possibly asked for: the most extreme and unpleasant aspects of the far-left amplified for all the world to see. The more absurd and outrageous SJWs become, the more the far-right gains support and sympathy. If SJWs think that they’re “oppressed” right now… well, they had better be prepared for the future that they’re helping to create.
I can't tell how many neo-nazis are actually out there. The Stormfront crowd has been unofficially let out of the dog house thanks to decades of liberals calling anything to the right of Dwight Eisenhower racist and fascist. However, from my perspective, not a small portion of the "Nazis" are adept trolls who know how to push SJW buttons.

I'm not even sure how the author above defines fascist. For the most part, people discussing the return of the patriarchy and similar ideas are anti-fascist, not wanting anything even remotely similar to the fascist revolutionaries of the 20th Century. Fascism was a democratic phenomena. It is also wholly anti-American, to the extent we're talking about Americans here.

SJWs have to scream loudly because ultimately, no one cares. Fascism is their rape fantasy. To be out-grouped is their greatest fear. Irrelevance is there nightmare.

Thursday, January 29, 2015

These Crows Are Not Racist Because They Are Not White Males

I Am So Tempted to Say that These European Crows Are Racists
In Europe, there are two groups of crows who are almost identical — except for for thing. Carrion crows are all black, while hooded crows have patches of gray. Each group prefers to mate with their own color. It sounds like what humans would call racism, but instead it's a lesson in the limits of anthropomorphism. ...And this brings me back to my earlier assertion, which is that this is one of those scenarios in animal behavior where it's extremely tempting to impose a human perspective and say that these crows are racists. They prefer to mate with their own color. The crows even have an actual color line running through their European habitat, dividing black from piebald. But the fact is that these crows' mating choices have nothing to do with a slave economy, historical inequalities between groups, or cultural conflicts — all hallmarks of human racism.
But if the birds did have slavery or inequality, that would obviously invalidate all the scientific evidence and prove that these crows are racist. If you click to the article, you can see the white feathered crow is the one accused of racism, which is what tempted the author. Perhaps if the crows were all white he would give into temptation.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Progressive Meltdown

A raging dumpster fire of hilarity is rolling across The Warren as rabbits start coming across feel bads online. The amygdala overloads, oxygen is cut to the brain and the result is a yellow stream of consciousness running down their leg. A beginner's guide to the Redpill Right
While these so-called “racial realist” views aren’t mainstream in science, they are common in the Redpill universe, especially its most militant and regressive regions, such as the Neoreaction movement. Also occasionally called the “Dark Enlightenment”, this is a movement that seeks to defeat “the Cathedral” (an incoherent alliance of everyone who isn’t a neoreactionary) and roll back liberal affectations like humanism and democracy in favor of monarchy, slavery and ethnic pogroms.
Thankfully, Neoreaction isn’t particularly large or influential. It is mostly confined to a handful of bloggers such as Michael Anissimov, software developer Curtis “Mencius Moldbug” Yarvin, and author Nick Land. But even this fringe of the Redpill Right finds support in unexpected places. You can find Redpiller arguments in any sufficiently young, sufficiently white, sufficiently male internet company, be they neoreactionaries or bitcoiners, hardcore skeptics or GamerGaters, tax evaders or pick-up artists.
Black Sun Rising
Today’s New Right and techno-futurist circles are echoing the unorthodox beliefs of Nazi cosmologists.

Leftism In Action: Destroying Africa

Care/harm: cherishing and protecting others.
Fairness/cheating: rendering justice according to shared rules. (Alternate name: Proportionality)
Liberty/oppression: the loathing of tyranny.
Loyalty/betrayal: standing with your group, family, nation. (Alternate name: Ingroup)
Authority/subversion: obeying tradition and legitimate authority. (Alternate name: Respect.)
Sanctity/degradation: abhorrence for disgusting things, foods, actions. (Alternate name: Purity.)
Based on Moral Foundations Theory, leftists care more care/harm and fairness. However, this reaches absurd levels with modern progressives who only care about the perceived care. Modern progressives are like Medieval doctors who used blood-letting as a treatment. Even if you showed them evidence that blood-letting was harming patients, they would argue that you are bad because you don't care about the sick.

This is why we get stories such as this one: Meant to Keep Malaria Out, Mosquito Nets Are Used to Haul Fish In
The nets have helped save millions of lives, but scientists worry about the collateral damage: Africa’s fish.
Part of the concern is the scale. Mosquito nets are now a billion-dollar industry, with hundreds of millions of insecticide-treated nets passed out in recent years, and many more on their way.
They arrive by the truckload in poor, waterside communities where people have been trying to scrape by with substandard fishing gear for as long as anyone can remember. All of a sudden, there are light, soft, surprisingly strong nets — for free. Many people said it would be foolish not to use them for fishing. 
“The nets go straight out of the bag into the sea,” said Isabel Marques da Silva, a marine biologist at Universidade Lúrio in Mozambique. “That’s why the incidence for malaria here is so high. The people don’t use the mosquito nets for mosquitoes. They use them to fish.”
Leftists are destroying the environment of Africa by their actions, and their response is to think of new ways to interfere in the lives of Africans. Always driven by the need to show they care, they do irreparable harm.

Now consider how the NYTimes would have written up that story if a Westerner opened a factory and polluted the water, causing less total damage while giving people a livelihood.

Sunday, January 25, 2015

Nearly 1 in 10 NYU Coeds Are Hookers

Henry Dampier calls this the terminal phase of feminism.

From the Atlantic: Where the Sugar Babies Are
What might have been little more than a nuisance in the past has turned into an outright hindrance to many students’ financial security: It takes about 14 years on average to pay off the debt. As a result, young women across the country are turning to sugar daddies in droves. Many of them use SeekingArrangement, which describes itself as "the world’s largest Sugar Daddy dating site." More than 1.4 million students have signed up as members, including nearly 1 million in the U.S., according to the company. The website claims that 42 percent of its members are students, many of whom are incentivized by SeekingArrangement to join; people who sign up with a .edu email address or show proof of enrollment, for example, receive "premium memberships" for free.
Dampier comments:
Families who sent their daughters to universities at great expense presumably didn’t do so in the hopes that they would be turned out like a truck stop pimp. A motel pimp can turn your daughter out for free, without the need to charge a family hundreds of thousands of dollars like NYU does.
Given that the Atlantic has taken to republishing press releases for an automated internet pimp without even charging them the typical rates that they do for native advertising, it’s interesting about how the magazine vacillates between glorifying women who sacrifice their sexuality at the altar of career, and the similar attempt to portray sexuality-as-career. Blaming student loans for the free decisions of the daughters of the middle class, who were supposedly learning judgment and discernment at university in return for those loan-provided tuition fees, is nonsensical — especially when many parents supplement loans with their own savings, in the hopes of advancing the station of their children through the mechanism of the university.
Feminism is but the female form of Man's desire to be free from God's Law or Nature's Consequences.

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Is He Pro or Anti-Democracy?

“It’s tempting to read this as a dumbing down of the bully pulpit,” [former Clinton speechwriter Jeff] Shesol said. “But it’s actually a sign of democratization. In the early Republic, presidents could assume that they were speaking to audiences made up mostly of men like themselves: educated, civic-minded landowners. These, of course, were the only Americans with the right to vote. But over time, the franchise expanded and presidential appeals had to reach a broader audience.”
President Obama's SOTU Speeches Are The 'Dumbest' In US History

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Cthulhu Swims Left, Left, Left

More Right: Frankfurt School Caused Progressivism

The average leftist is ignorant and always swimming left, so whatever the world is today, it obviously isn't a result of leftism.

Sunday, January 18, 2015

After Polygamy Comes Pedophilia and Incest

World War P Beckons
Someone on Twitter shared an Upworthy article on a 19-year-old pedophile who has never gone near a child (not giving Upworthy clicks). The Upworthy article was wasteful clickbait saying to listen to this This American life podcast (I didn’t listen to it). It also link to this sob story of 16-year-old pedophile.* It’s looking more likely that World War P may be on the horizon.
New York Magazine promoting ‘consensual incest’, apparently already legal in New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Quebec
Sure, they may appear to just be presenting an account of ‘consensual’ incest, but to publish a long interview with a pro-incest advocate as they’ve done, while maintaining an ostensibly neutral, non-judgmental tone, frankly ends up, in essence, giving a platform for advocacy of that view. (And the progs ridiculed us when we said ‘gay marriage’ was a slippery slope…)
This comes on the heels of the Vagina Monologues being banned for transphobia. Which has feminists turning to right-wing media for news:
It’s sad that conservative media does a better job of reporting the destruction of women’s rights through transgenderism than so-called “liberal” media.
You ain't seen nothing yet.

Friday, January 16, 2015

Prepare For Polygamy!


There's no way the court can rule in favor of gay marriage and not also legalize polygamy. They might concoct some BS reason, but if states are forbidden from passing laws defining marriage as between a man and a woman, they cannot then legislate that marriage is between 2 people. Either the state has the power to define it, or it doesn't.



Blog Archive